{"id":9974,"date":"2025-05-28T13:18:14","date_gmt":"2025-05-28T11:18:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/?p=9974"},"modified":"2025-06-12T10:58:17","modified_gmt":"2025-06-12T08:58:17","slug":"tar-rejects-the-ministry-of-the-interiors-restrictions-ughi-e-nunziante-in-the-stop-to-the-mandatory-in-person-identification-in-short-term-rentals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/tar-rejects-the-ministry-of-the-interiors-restrictions-ughi-e-nunziante-in-the-stop-to-the-mandatory-in-person-identification-in-short-term-rentals\/","title":{"rendered":"TAR rejects the Ministry of the Interior\u2019s restrictions: Ughi e Nunziante in the Stop to the mandatory \u201cin-person\u201d identification in short-term rentals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p data-start=\"52\" data-end=\"320\">With judgment no. 10210\/2025, published yesterday, May 27, the Administrative Court of Rome (TAR Roma) annulled the contested Circular issued by the Ministry of the Interior, which required managers of non-hotel accommodation facilities to identify guests \u201cin person.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"322\" data-end=\"677\">The Court upheld the appeal filed by the Federation of Non-Hotel Accommodation Associations (F.A.R.E.), represented by a legal team from <strong>Ughi e Nunziante<\/strong>, led by partner <strong>Andrea Marega<\/strong> and composed of <strong>Emily Maxwell<\/strong>, <strong>Tiziana Fiorella<\/strong>, <strong>Francesco De Filippis<\/strong>\u00a0and <strong>Giorgia Diotallevi<\/strong>. The Court found the measure to be unlawful on several grounds.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"679\" data-end=\"1095\">At the heart of the case was the interpretation of Article 109 of the TULPS (Consolidated Law on Public Security), which was amended in 2011 to simplify the obligations for operators. According to the TAR, the Circular issued in November 2024 had effectively reintroduced an in-person identification requirement that had already been repealed, disregarding the reform and placing an unnecessary burden on the sector.<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1097\" data-end=\"1383\">The panel also emphasized that in-person identification does not provide greater security than remote check-in and criticized the lack of concrete data supporting the measure. \u201cThere is no evidence,\u201d the ruling states, \u201cto show why remote identification would not be equally effective.\u201d<\/p>\n<p data-start=\"1385\" data-end=\"1658\" data-is-last-node=\"\" data-is-only-node=\"\">With this decision, the TAR reaffirms a key principle: administrative measures must be proportionate, well-grounded, and compliant with the current legal framework. In the meantime, digital check-in is reinstated for non-hotel hosts \u2014 and they can breathe a sigh of relief.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With judgment no. 10210\/2025, published yesterday, May 27, the Administrative Court of Rome (TAR Roma) annulled the contested Circular issued by the Ministry of the Interior, which required managers of non-hotel accommodation facilities to identify guests \u201cin person.\u201d The Court upheld the appeal filed by the Federation of Non-Hotel Accommodation Associations (F.A.R.E.), represented by a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9974","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comunicati-stampa"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9974","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9974"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9974\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9981,"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9974\/revisions\/9981"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9974"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9974"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.unlaw.it\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9974"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}